Book Reviews, The Noble Nobel Project
Comments 11

Why do you hate the South? – Absalom, Absalom! by William Faulkner

Absalom, Absalom! by William Faulkner

It is not without trepidation that I returned to reading Faulkner just a couple of months back. I say trepidation because I know how mad and meandering and mentally debilitating Faulknerian narrative can. And I say returned because I’d like to believe that Faulkner was one of the authors who greatly influenced my literary tastes during my early college days. Yes, I know that’s very presumptuous of me to claim for I have only read one short story (A Rose for Emily) and one novel (The Sound and the Fury) of his, but these two are enough for me to appreciate flair and style in novels.

He also instilled in me the love for one hundred commas within a one thousand word write-up. And after finishing this novel, Absalom, I approached our resident Hemingway scholar in our book club, asked him if he has ever read Faulkner, and when he answered no, I apologized and proclaimed myself to be a fan of the Faulknerian School of Narrative.

But between my proclamation and the turning of the last page, I am not even sure if I understood enough of this novel for me to love it. As I was looking back at the events and the revelations, I felt a terrible ache spreading within my chest. I was restless, and I had to keep turning this question inside my head: Why does Quentin hate the South?

“I dont hate it,” Quentin said, quickly, at once, immediately; “I dont hate it,” he said. I dont hate it he thought, panting in the cold air, the iron New England dark: I dont. I dont! I dont hate it! I dont hate it!

Absalom, Absalom! (yes, exclamation is point included) is the story of Thomas Sutpen, a squalid man who arrives in Mississippi, buys a piece of land, builds a great house he names Sutpen’s Hundred, rises in the social ladder of that town, procreates, leaves, comes and goes, comes and goes, and ends in… So Sutpen’s story is told in a series of retellings and flashbacks by Quentin Compson, a very familiar character for those who have read The Sound and the Fury, to his Harvard roommate.

This roommate, Shreve, is the one who asks the important question. As you have just read, Quentin vehemently denies it. He thinks it over and tries to convince himself that he doesn’t hate the place. But first, what made Shreve ask the question?

It is less of a question than the understanding that Quentin does hate the South. When asked to tell him about the place where he came from, everything that Quentin related to Shreve was filled with acid bitterness, violent relationships, ignoble histories, and gloomy memories that one can’t help getting the feeling that the storyteller is indeed filled with rankling rancor about what he is talking about.

And yet, how can Quentin hate the South when his roots are all anchored there? In accepting this hatred, he would also have to accept that he somehow hates himself. He is and will always have a part of the South, hence, the denial. This unnoticed self-hatred might be a major factor which contributed to his actions in The Sound and the Fury.

Aside from Quentin narrating, Rosa Coldfield contributes to this nasty job of reconstructing the past. She is Sutpen’s sister-in-law, and when her sister Ellen dies, she is promised marriage by Sutpen himself, only to be jilted. It is no wonder why her story is biased, and Quentin seeks out other narrators. His grandfather and father are other sources, so the stories of the three, plus Quentin’s, mingle with each other like vapors coalescing in the air and forming a thick, nearly impenetrable fog.

4 star - really liked itThis shifty narration is a cause of headache. The sentences can just run forever, and one’s patience can surely be daunted if he tries so hard at understanding every single phrase. My advice: just keep on reading. I believe that it was designed to be that way. The story will plant itself inside your head. Rather, it would accumulate deep within your subconscious with such terrifying strength capable of unseating and transporting you to that place and time where Sutpen’s story took place.

Sutpen’s story is scattered all over the novel, but this book is not only about him. It also depicts the white people’s attitudes toward the blacks. Have you ever heard of the word octoroon? It is what you call a person with an eighth of black blood in his ancestry. Such things mattered during the time of the novel, and the great divide between the whites and the blacks slowly dissolves as interracial marriages start to become a common thing at the end.

And upon arriving at this end, you are not sure if Sutpen is a real bad guy as Rosa firmly believes, or just confused and a little lost. As I continue to think about it, I see him in my mind’s eye, at least his ghost, standing at the charred ruins of Sutpen’s Hundred, perhaps waiting for his mixed-blood idiot grandson to conquer the South.



    • Thanks, Sarah. After reading this, I strongly suggest the reader to read his other novel, The Sound and the Fury, so that we can follow up on Quentin. :)


  1. Since the past is frequently present in Faulkner, it makes sense that his sentences are so tangled, because yesterday keeps intruding on today, and making things complicated. I like the fact you spoke to your Hemingway friend. When anyone says to me, style and content are separable … I always reply, try to write “The Sun Also Rises” as if you were Faulkner.


    • I see the point, although I have yet to read the Hemingway novel you mentioned (I’ve only read A Farewell to Arms and The Old Man and the Sea). My friend didn’t take it against me that I sided with Faulkner, but I think there will be something that we could debate on once he starts picking up Faulkner’s works. Thanks for dropping by! :)


  2. It’s very interesting to read these comments as I’m shortly giving a presentation on Faulkner to a local University of the Third Age literature group. I love Faulkner with his noble themes, fascinating settings, strong characterisations, arresting dialogue and often gripping plots. The writing is not as “difficult” as some people think – and it’s not all long sentences unburdened by punctuation; there are some superb one-liners too. My favourite is “Light in August” which I first read nearly fifty years ago; until then I had given little thought to racism – Faulkner helped change all that.

    An elderly Aussie female Faulkner fan


  3. DBlock says

    Rosa Coldfield is not “jilted” like you state. Rather, she rejects the would be nuptials because Sutpen states he will only marry her if she gives him a son. As the offer is too revolting for a woman of her proud temperament she leaves Sutpen’s Hundred never to return again.
    Besides this, her bitterness likely comes more from her father, who starved to death rather than fight the Yankees in order to stand for his Principles, abandoning her, a mere child, to fend for herself during a dangerous Civil War. Her grandiose talk of Confederate War heroes, a historian which she is, shows her disdain for her father and Sutpen, two men she has pellucid hatred for.


Thoughts? Feelings?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s